In a world of work that’s changed rapidly in the two years of the pandemic, I feel we need to ask the “Why” more than ever before. This is a new normal and as we switch between work patterns, such as forced-remote, remote-first, all-remote and hybrid, some practices will have to die. Others may have to change.

In this post, I want to explore two sprint ceremonies with a “Why” lens. I’ll also share a few ways you can buy back time for your team by taking lightweight, more async-friendly approaches to manage iterative development.

If working remotely is more productive, what’s face-to-face (F2F) good for anymore? In today’s post, I want to explore that question in some depth. I have strong opinions; so don’t get all bent out of shape when you read this.

When you’re in a remote setup, think of your retro not as a meeting, but as a process. That process has two parts - asynchronous and synchronous. How much you do asynchronously is totally up to you and how adept you feel with working this way. This post will tell you how to run effective retros distributed team, with a solid sprinkling of asynchronous methods.

In today’s post, we’ll dive into the agile sprint - a time-box of approximately two weeks, when development teams work on a set of user stories they’ve prioritised to deliver. We’ll examine two synchronous collaboration practices - story kick-offs and dev-box tests or desk checks and how we can adapt them to a remote-native; async-first way of working.

Distributed standups are painful, period. With modern tools there are better ways of getting the value you’d expect from such a meeting. As an individual, you’ll get back a few minutes of your life every day. The bigger benefit? You can share updates continuously, and at your own pace. From a team perspective, you’ll be able to create an audit trail of communication and, of course, plough back the time savings into deep work.

As a team scales, the need for documentation increases in parallel with the cost of not doing it. Daunting as it may seem, a handbook-first approach has many advantages, and will give your team a way to self-govern and self-organise. In this post, I’ll walk you through some ideas about what to include in such a resource and how you can create and maintain it.

It’s clear that we need fewer meetings. This is step one to being asynchronous, and I’d argue that it’s the most important step to take if you want to be a productive, remote-first organisation. In this post, I’ll outline the ConveRel quadrants for you to figure out which meetings you need and which ones you can get rid of.

It’s time to lay out the framework for change. It all starts with values and guidelines. In addition, the team needs to reflect on the work they’re doing. Motivation is no trivial matter. So in this post, we’ll also discuss a few important parameters that your team can use to judge how motivated they are with the work they’re doing and the way they organise. Consider this as a set of sensible defaults to begin your journey of change.